← Going Deeper: Intermediate Astrology · lesson 25/38

Composite and Davison charts: the relationship's own chart

Listen to this article

In the synastry guide, we compared two people's charts by the aspects between them. But there's a second, quite different way to read a relationship: give the relationship itself a chart — a single wheel that belongs not to either person, but to the bond between them. There are two ways to build one, and both are worth knowing.

The composite chart — an average of two people

A composite chart is made by averaging two birth charts. For every point, you take the midpoint of the two people's versions — the composite Sun sits exactly between her Sun and his Sun, and so on all the way round. The result is a brand-new chart that describes the relationship as an entity: its purpose, its temperament, its strengths and sore spots.

It's a lovely idea — the couple as a third thing, with a Sun sign and a Moon sign of its own. Robert Hand's work made the composite a staple of modern relationship astrology.

The Davison chart — a real moment in between

The Davison chart (named after the astrologer Ronald Davison) does something more concrete. Instead of averaging the charts, it averages the births themselves: it finds the exact midpoint in time between the two people's birth moments, and the geographic midpoint in space between their birthplaces, and casts a real chart for that time and place.

The difference matters: because a Davison is an actual moment, it's a proper chart you could have cast for a real event — so it can be progressed and have transits run to it, just like a birth chart. The composite is an elegant abstraction; the Davison is a real point in space and time between two lives.

Which to use

Most astrologers use them alongside synastry, not instead of it:

Read together, you get both the spark and the substance: how the two of you strike each other, and what the thing you've made together is actually like.

Keeping it in perspective

These are intermediate tools — you meet them once synastry feels comfortable, and a beginner needn't rush to them. And the usual honesty holds: a composite or Davison describes a relationship's tendencies and themes, not its fate. Plenty of "difficult" relationship charts belong to happy, lasting couples who simply did the work.

One last thought

I'm quietly moved by the composite and Davison idea — that when two people come together, something genuinely new exists that neither of them is, and that it, too, has a sky. A relationship as a third person in the room, with its own hopes and habits. Whether you read the chart or not, it's a kind and true way to think about love: not two people measured against each other, but a third thing the two of you are tending, together.

← Previous Synastry: what happens when two charts meet Next → Horary astrology: asking the sky a question

← Going Deeper: Intermediate Astrology